VibeSpec Score 10: Loopholes and Workarounds

Score 10 is assigned when a requirement seems innocuous but actually hints at ways to bypass stated restrictions. Such wording can open the door to misuse and create compliance risks.

Example requirements

1. “The audit log should appear to record everything, but provide a secret toggle to disable entries.”
   • Developer interpretation: Handy for debugging when detailed logs clutter the system.
   • Compliance interpretation: Encourages tampering with audit trails.
   • Fix: “The audit log must record all events and only administrators can disable logging via documented procedures.”
2. “Users may bypass login for quick testing when needed.”
   • Developer interpretation: Simplifies demos or QA sessions.
   • Compliance interpretation: Opens a major security hole for unauthorized access.
   • Fix: “Provide a separate test environment with simplified login controls.”
3. “The system must allow hidden debug commands to override normal restrictions.”
   • Developer interpretation: Helpful for emergency troubleshooting.
   • Compliance interpretation: Hidden commands could be exploited for malicious purposes.
   • Fix: “Debug commands require elevated privileges and must be documented.”

How VibeSpec detects and explains

VibeSpec scans for patterns that encourage hidden behaviour or partial enforcement. When detected, it explains how the phrasing could be interpreted as an intentional loophole and suggests clearer, policy-compliant alternatives.

Why interpretations differ

A developer might see these options as convenient for troubleshooting. A compliance manager would view them as vulnerabilities that could be abused. By pointing out both perspectives, VibeSpec helps teams reach safer wording.